|
Thursday July 1, 3:22 PM
What is the market waiting for?
Its budget time! More than anytime in the past, the
stock markets are looking forward to this Budget, for a ‘sense of direction’.
The common belief is that the markets are likely to remain range bound till
the budget. But why is the market waiting for this budget to get a
sense of direction? Aren’t things apparent in some sense already?
To start of with, we have culled out some key points from the current
government’s Common Minimum Programme (CMP) that are of significance
from the stock market perspective.
-
The government will ensure that the services industry will be given
full support to fulfill its true growth and employment potential.
- Irrigation will receive the highest priority
and all ongoing projects will be completed according to a strict time schedule.
- FDI will continue to be encouraged and actively
sought. The country needs and can easily absorb atleast 2 to 3 times the present
level of FDI inflows.
- Competition in the financial sector will be
expanded. PSU banks will get full managerial autonomy.
- The government will retain existing ‘navratna’
companies in the PSU sector while these companies are allowed to raise capital.
- Commitment to remove revenue deficit by 2009.
- FIIs will continue to be encouraged.
It concludes by saying “This is a common minimum programme for the UPA
government. It is, by no means, a comprehensive agenda. It is a starting point
that highlights the main priorities, policies and programmes. The UPA government
is committed to the implementation of the CMP”
The government has clearly explained its stand towards disinvestment,
FDI, initiating measures to create employment opportunities and providing a
foundation for sustainable GDP growth in the long-term. If one believes that
the new government is going to function broadly on the basis of the CMP, what
is it that the stock market is waiting to hear from the Budget 2005?
As far as timely implementation of government policies are
oncerned, in coalition politics, one has to have a certain extent of realism.
- For example, according to CMIE, doubling of
credit to rural areas in the next three years, as envisaged by the CMP, is
next to impossible. While banks could face some pressure given the inherent
risk of defaults in agricultural lending, to what extent is the concern
justified? Is this the primary reason why banking stocks are falling?
- Besides, can this government continue to
subsidise LPG, kerosene, urea, provide employment guarantee and attain its
objective of zero revenue deficit by 2009?
So, why ‘wait’? Consider the events that have unfolded since January 2004. We
have had train bombings in Spain, pre-election survey jitters, election results,
CMP, fears regarding rise in interest rates and now the budget. Once the budget
is over, the stock markets will wait for execution. Every time markets will be
‘waiting’ for a sense of direction. Sometimes, it is better to ignore what Mr.
Market says.
While we are not trying to downplay the importance of the
budget, the issues that are important are much broader in nature. Apart
from the tinkering of excise and customs duty and so on, which is a regular
phenomenon, the new government has to focus on fundamental issues i.e.
poverty, illiteracy and inadequate healthcare. These three factors are
one of the key reasons why the country is unable to move to the next level
of growth. Of course, any policy measures addressing these concerns
will yield results only in the long-term. But who said the Budget is about
one year, anyways!
The fact of the matter is that there is really no big trigger
in sight for the stock market in the near term. In these times, what we suggest
to the retail investor instead is that there are good companies/sectors
available at descent valuations from a 3-year perspective at current levels.
Identify those and invest in a staggered manner so that the risk is distributed
over a period of time.
To quote Mr. Adi Godrej, Chairman, Godrej Consumer Products
Limited “I think the Indian economy is in a mode now where one should not be
looking at the government for things”.
|